Of course, if the game were to leave the current timeline and fully incorporate said renaissance, all proposed nations and more would work.ĭanes early game could be more vikingy and late game more like the Hanseatic League, people often overlook the area, marking it insignificant. Hm, if you want the spanish in the timeline you can also take the dutch for the late renaissance.

Ethiopia could be seen trading with italian cities, but that was very vague.Īgain, there is too much renaissance like most of the other proposed nations to fit the game. They had nearly nothing to do with the ingame existing nation. Poles were a factor but at that time only regional, just like the teutonic order. They were preoccupied with themselves and were not yet actors on the world stage. More was not at that time like Japanese and italian city states. Maybe just venice, but they had only trade and a few political intentions to the german hanse and africa and for muslim nations already evasive to save the tariffs. Just as little as the ottomans or saracens and spanish/portuguese. Vikings have nothing to do there, they were already on the decline and only one more annoyance in the (high) middle ages. Tibet would also be an interesting variant then in addition. I would still like to see the persians and afghans to better carry the 'orient'. Originally posted by Ant Ra:In order to correspond to the international significance of the timeline of the game:īyzantium, Hungary, Korea and just the Danes.

Apache ant obsolete